Ground-Fault Protection Analysis for Electrical Installations in a Multi-Story Office Building
Abstract
Reliable ground-fault protection is essential in multi-story building electrical installations because insulation failure, leakage current, and inadequate grounding may increase the risk of electric shock, fire, and equipment damage. This study evaluates the ground-fault protection system of the One-Stop Service Office Building in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Field measurements were conducted at 15 grounding points using the three-point fall-of-potential method with a Kyoritsu 4105A earth resistance tester. The installed residual current devices, locally configured as Earth Leakage Circuit Breakers (ELCBs), were assessed against PUIL 2020, IEC 60364, IEC 60479-1, and IEC 61008-1 requirements. Protection coordination and single line-to-ground fault behavior were further analyzed using ETAP 19.0. The measured grounding resistance ranged from 0.93 Ω to 6.21 Ω, with an average value of 2.56 Ω. Twelve grounding points, or 80% of the measured locations, complied with the 5 Ω maximum limit, whereas G-12, G-14, and G-15 exceeded the standard with values of 5.28 Ω, 5.85 Ω, and 6.21 Ω, respectively. The installed 30 mA ELCBs were suitable for personnel protection; however, type AC devices were still used on circuits supplying non-linear loads such as UPS and variable-frequency drives. Several toilet socket circuits were also found without residual current protection. The ELCB–MCB coordination was selective for low-level leakage currents, although simultaneous operation may occur around 160 A. Corrective actions include installing parallel rod electrodes, applying bentonite-based soil treatment, replacing type AC RCDs with type A devices on non-linear circuits, and implementing six-month preventive testing.
Keywords
Downloads
Article Metrics & Download Trend
Last 12 monthsHow to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Solehan, Novia Utami Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Total: 17A. S. Wardana, “Analysis of Transformer Oil Maintenance Management in Electrical Power Distribution Systems,” Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (JEEI), vol. 1, no. 1, 2026, [Online]. Available: https://siap.sttnlampung.ac.id/index.php/jeei/article/view/161
G. Denche, E. Faleiro, G. Asensio, and J. Moreno, “Grounding Electrodes with Internal Resistance: Application to Feasibility Study of the Driven-Rod Method for Modeling the Soil Electrical Resistivity Profile,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 5032, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11115032.
D. E. Putra, M. I. Jambak, and Z. Nawawi, “The Effectiveness of Bentonite in Reducing Soil Resistance in Acidic Water Swampland,” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1657–1665, 2025, doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v23i6.27094.
S. K. Ahmad, R. Z. Sabry, and C. Gomes, “Improving the Grounding System by Adding Bentonite to Reduce the Potential Distribution,” in 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE), 2021, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICECCE52056.2021.9514191.
L. Z. Kang, S. C. Lim, U. Muhammad, F. Aman, and N. M. Nor, “Comparative Field Assessment of Grounding Enhancement Material for Electrical Earthing System,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 13, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.11591/eei.v13i5.7303.
S. Czapp, K. Dobrzynski, J. Klucznik, and Z. Lubosny, “Behavior of Residual Current Devices at Earth Fault Currents with DC Component,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 21, p. 8382, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22218382.
A. Azmi, N. A. Ahmad, L. K. Yiew, and Z. Abdul-Malek, “The Use of Enhancement Material in Grounding System: A Review,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 453–460, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i2.pp453-460.
V. P. Androvitsaneas, K. D. Damianaki, C. A. Christodoulou, and I. F. Gonos, “Effect of Soil Resistivity Measurement on the Safe Design of Grounding Systems,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3170, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13123170.
J. Sutaria, A. Espin-Delgado, and S. Ronnberg, “Measurements and Modeling of the Frequency Behavior of Residual Current Devices—From 4 Hz to 40 kHz,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 209, p. 108052, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108052.
R. Ahmad et al., “Application of Mineral Compounds for a High-Voltage Portable Grounding System: An Experimental Study,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 16, p. 2043, 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10162043.
V. P. Androvitsaneas, I. F. Gonos, and I. A. Stathopulos, “Research and Applications of Ground Enhancing Compounds in Grounding Systems,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 3195–3201, 2017, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0233.
T. Slangen, B. Lustenhouwer, V. Cuk, and J. F. G. Cobben, “The Effects of High-Frequency Residual Currents on the Operation of Residual Current Devices,” Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, vol. 19, pp. 67–72, 2021, doi: 10.24084/repqj19.216.
G. Denche, E. Faleiro, G. Asensio, and J. Moreno, “Grounding Electrodes with Internal Resistance: Application to Feasibility Study of the Driven-Rod Method for Modeling the Soil Electrical Resistivity Profile,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 5032, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11115032.
F. Sinchi-Sinchi, C. Coronel-Naranjo, A. Barragan-Escandon, and F. Quizhpi-Palomeque, “Soil Treatment to Reduce Grounding Resistance by Applying Low-Resistivity Material (LRM) Implemented in Different Grounding Systems Configurations and in Soils with Different Resistivities,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 4788, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12094788.
S. Czapp, “Testing Sensitivity of A-Type Residual Current Devices to Earth Fault Currents with Harmonics,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 2044, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20072044.
M. S. Reffin, N. A. Ghazali, M. Z. A. Ab-Kadir, M. Izadi, N. Azis, and H. Ahmad, “Seasonal Influences on the Impulse Characteristics of Grounding Systems for Tropical Countries,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1334, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12071334.
P. Czaja, “Influence of the Design of a Residual Current Device on Its Break Time,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 23, p. 9054, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15239054.